Louisa Chirico vs Mayar Sherif Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Jul at 05:51 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Chirico vs M. Sherif

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Sherif
They have played 3 sets in total, with Louisa Chirico winning 2 and Mayar Sherif winning 1. The last match between Louisa Chirico and Mayar Sherif was at the European Open - Hamburg, 14-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 4-6 7-5 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chirico | 1 |
| Sherif | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) European Open - Hamburg(07-14-25)
L. Chirico vs M. Sherif H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $666,232 | Career Prize Money | $1,018,848 |
| 55.34% (347-280) | Career Total W/L | 63.87% (304-172) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 20 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (2-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 7.14% (1-13) |
L. Chirico vs M. Sherif Match Preview:
- Chirico's recent second serve performance is slightly weaker, winning 37.13% of points, compared to Sherif's 40.43%. This suggests Sherif might have an edge in service games.
- In return games, Chirico outperforms slightly by winning 51.88% of opponents' second serve points compared to Sherif's 50.56%. Chirico also excels in first serve returns with 35.84% success rate against Sherif's 33.47%.
- Facing pressure, Sherif is more adept at saving breakpoints with a 50.78% success rate, while Chirico saves 42.63%. This could influence in-game momentum.
- Over the past year, Sherif has a higher winning percentage, securing 57.89% of her matches, while Chirico has 52.94%.
- Both players excel on clay, but Sherif has a superior career win rate of 74% compared to Chirico's 61% on this surface.
- Reflecting on player levels, Chirico has a 59.18% win rate in lower-tier events, whereas Sherif shows dominance with an 82.05% win record at the same level.
- Sherif consistently faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 180.56, as opposed to Chirico's average of 248.06.
- In discussions of deciding set performance, Chirico shows resilience by winning 52% of deciding sets, surpassing Sherif's 40% success rate in such situations.
- Break point conversion is another area where Chirico shines; she converts 41.04% of opportunities, compared to Sherif's 36.67%.
Editorial Prediction (July 14, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head analysis reveals distinct advantages for both players. Sherif's stronger overall performance and higher success under pressure suggest she has the upper hand in service and breakpoint scenarios. Her ability to win against stronger opponents further solidifies her competitive edge.
However, Chirico's superior return game and break point conversion could disrupt Sherif's serve, making for a tightly contested match. Additionally, if the match extends to a deciding set, Chirico's resilience may play a pivotal role.
Considering recent performance trends and current competitive framework, Sherif is favored to win this upcoming match, but Chirico's specific strengths may pose significant challenges.
Louisa Chirico vs Mayar Sherif Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Chirico vs M. Sherif H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:29:52 | Average Match Time | 2:29:52 |
| 50% (53/107) | 1st Serve % | 81% (83/102) |
| 62% (33/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (41/83) |
| 44% (24/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 32% (6/19) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
| 51% (52/102) | Return Points Win % | 47% (50/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Chirico Recent Matches Played
M. Sherif Recent Matches Played

L. Chirico vs M. Sherif Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.34% (347/280) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.87% (304/172) |
| 53.75% (782/673) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.22% (672/408) |
| 51.36% (6949/6580) | Games Win/Loss | 54.76% (5420/4477) |
| 49.04% (128/133) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.00% (72/78) |
| 61.20% (183/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 72.93% (229/85) |
| 58.49% (31/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 35.71% (5/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 959 | Aces Total | 831 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2270 | Total Double Faults | 598 |
| 1:15:47 | Average Match Time | 1:31:13 |
| 462.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 389.14 |
| 59% (20511/34660) | 1st Serve % | 72% (19399/26960) |
| 62% (12640/20511) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12193/19399) |
| 44% (6274/14147) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3713/7560) |
| 48% (1994/4189) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1564/3447) |
| 45% (15274/33766) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12387/27526) |
| 37.21% (16/27) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (14/21) |
| 43.75% (14/18) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (11/22) |
| 47.27% (52/58) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (30/40) |
| 59.15% (252/174) | Challenger W/L | 76.50% (166/51) |
| 81.25% (13/3) | Futures W/L | 68.60% (83/38) |
| 55% (336/615) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (300/468) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (89/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (68/104) |
| 53% (113/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (66/132) |
| 84% (336/282) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (310/270) |
| 16% (336/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (310/40) |
| 22% (291/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (166/33) |